[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 18:07:46 +0200 |
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014, at 19:26, Chris Allegretta wrote:
> I'd imagin[e] Pico would treat marked and unmarked cuts as different
> things,
I've checked, and... it depends. Cutting a marked section after having
done a series of ^Ks will blow away that leading series. But doing a
series of ^Ks after having cut a marked section adds the lines to the
cutbuffer. Doing a ^U then looks messy. So I still think nano shouldn't
do that.
> It's not clear to me what the user
> is expecting nano to do with two different cut types in the same
> buffer, it should not be supported.
Okay. So when ^K clears the mark, a subsequent ^K should clear
the cutbuffer. Yes?
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software
or over the web
- Re: [Nano-devel] found a small failure in the undo stuff, (continued)
- Re: [Nano-devel] found a small failure in the undo stuff, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/08
- [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/13
- [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Chris Allegretta, 2014/06/16
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour,
Benno Schulenberg <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Chris Allegretta, 2014/06/17