[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour
|
From: |
Mark Majeres |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:00:56 -0700 |
On 6/17/14, Benno Schulenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> Okay. So when ^K clears the mark, a subsequent ^K should clear
> the cutbuffer. Yes?
>
> Benno
>
My vote is yes, and the latest version of the cutbuffer_reset patch
already reflects this for both cutting and copying.
-Mark Majeres
- [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, (continued)
- [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/13
- [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Chris Allegretta, 2014/06/16
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour,
Mark Majeres <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Chris Allegretta, 2014/06/17