[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature
From: |
Erik Lundin |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2014 20:55:46 +0100 |
> Please look at do_wrap(), it shows how to use sub-undo's by only using
> the existing undo structure. Try to do all of the work in "tabs to
> spaces" by using the do_delete() functions and wrapping the addition
> of spaces with add_undo(ADD) and update_undo(ADD)
>
>
> --Mark Majeres
I've looked through the do_wrap() function and personally i think the
whole undo function needs a remake. Retrofitting new code to fit the old
code that never was designed to work that way seems wrong. For example,
implementing a "undo step" function will be unnecessarily complicated
with the current code.
But i understand that there's a lot of politics involved. Is Chris still
the lead designer? What's your view on this Chris?
--
Erik Lundin <address@hidden>
- [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Mark Majeres, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature,
Erik Lundin <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Mark Majeres, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Mark Majeres, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Mark Majeres, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Mark Majeres, 2014/10/31
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/31
- Message not available
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/31
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/10/31