[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature
From: |
Mark Majeres |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:10:14 -0700 |
>> I've looked through the do_wrap() function and personally i think the
>> whole undo function needs a remake. Retrofitting new code to fit the old
>> code that never was designed to work that way seems wrong. For example,
>> implementing a "undo step" function will be unnecessarily complicated
>> with the current code.
>>
>> But i understand that there's a lot of politics involved.
Hi Erik,
The undo code is really not that complicated. Can you further
elaborate on the idea for re-doing the entire undo function? I cannot
imagine that redoing everything would be less complicated than
implementing an "undo step" function. However, I don't understand
what that is exactly. Please also describe the complications that you
foresee in creating this "undo step" function.
--Mark Majeres
- [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Mark Majeres, 2014/10/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/27
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature,
Mark Majeres <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Mark Majeres, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Mark Majeres, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Mark Majeres, 2014/10/31
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/31
- Message not available
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Erik Lundin, 2014/10/31
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/10/31
- Re: [Nano-devel] The undo feature, Chris Allegretta, 2014/10/29