[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal
From: |
Valdis . Kletnieks |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jan 2006 21:26:14 -0500 |
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 09:22:44 PST, Bill Wohler said:
> address@hidden writes:
>
> > dist should be enhanced so that if the original message being
> > redistributed has BCC recipients, that recipient list is supressed
> > when the copy is redistributed
>
> Yes, that would allow information to be saved in the Fcc while not
> endangering the bcc list.
What about 'forw -mime'? This looks like a can of worms. ;)
pgpd55oFjZfD5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Nmh-workers] new stuff for 2.0 (FCC behavior for BCC proposal), bergman, 2006/01/03
- [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Bill Wohler, 2006/01/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, bergman, 2006/01/04
- [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Bill Wohler, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal,
Valdis . Kletnieks <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Tethys, 2006/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/08