[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal
From: |
Tethys |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:19:44 +0000 |
Chad Walstrom writes:
>Would it be good enough to insert a header that refers to a path of
>the file containing the recorded BCC?
>
> X-MH-Bcc-Path: ~/Mail/.ahu7216hlkuq6.bcc
>
>If this were included while forwarding the message, it wouldn't really
>matter.
Arguably it might. The original recipient would then be able to see
that the original message had been sent to others via bcc. They wouldn't
be able to tell *which* others, but that's not always relevant. In many
cases, they could take an educated guess.
Tet
- [Nmh-workers] new stuff for 2.0 (FCC behavior for BCC proposal), bergman, 2006/01/03
- [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Bill Wohler, 2006/01/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, bergman, 2006/01/04
- [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Bill Wohler, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal,
Tethys <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: FCC behavior for BCC proposal, Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/08