[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)
From: |
Joel Reicher |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal) |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:50:37 +1100 |
> having IMAP folder names be "different" would be a Kosmik Lose(tm)
> the only reason to do IMAP would be because it's transparent.
Every GUI for IMAP that I've ever seen presents the remote folders in
a "section" or "subfolder" representing the IMAP account. This permits
mutiple IMAP accounts and local folders.
Namespacing for remote folders is a reality, not a contrivance. Making
them look like "normal" folder names would just be syntactic sugar, IMHO,
but it could probably be done.
Cheers,
- Joel
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Chad Walstrom, 2006/01/06
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Bill Wohler, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Mike O'Dell, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal),
Joel Reicher <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Mike O'Dell, 2006/01/08
- [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Robert Elz, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Chris Garrigues, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Josh Bressers, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ?, Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Oliver Kiddle, 2006/01/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/10