[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:19:43 -0500 |
>I can freshen up the branch. Did anyone ever review it? Should I merge it
>as is? We should settle the api key management issue too.
I looked at it, but I cannot say that I reviewed it; every time I sat down
to really study it, I got lost in the whole OAUTH maze, then I got busy,
it fell onto the back burner ... and here we are.
I understand, it's a bit complicated. If you're willing to refresh it,
please do. Maybe I'll ping you off-list to fill in some of the protocol
details.
I agree with David; leave it on the branch for now.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, David Levine, 2016/03/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, norm, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, David Levine, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, norm, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, David Levine, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/08
Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?, Eric Gillespie, 2016/03/10