Re: nmh 1.8RC2, xlbiff, and $HOME

[David Levine]

Ralph wrote:

> This close to a release, I think we should stick with requiring HOME to
> be non-empty if it's set as otherwise there's too many paths to consider
> which the test harness probably doesn't exercise.

I'd rather crank out an RC3 than pass up the opportunity to solidify
the behaviour here.

Ken's point that different treatmet of unset vs empty HOME is a mistake
is fairly compelling for me.

David