[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47680] classdef @ operator to overrided super

From: John W. Eaton
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47680] classdef @ operator to overrided superclass methods
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:22:01 -0500 (EST)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0

Follow-up Comment #24, bug #47680 (project octave):

No, it wasn't intentional to omit the argument from the superclass method. 
But does it have to error if the argument isn't used in the function?  I
believe that in Matlab, calling any function with more arguments than appear
in the function definition is an error, but we don't do that automatically in
Octave.  If you think we should, then I think that deserves a separate


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via Savannah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]