[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73 |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:19:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-7.5.20060mdk (X11/20050322) |
> I suppose we haven't needed to do this because the template functions
> we've needed to call so far could all be resolved by the arguments
> alone. What is wrong with they way you are handling this case now?
Well the #define CXX_NEW_FRIEND_TEMPLATE_DECL made me think that you
were trying to avoid using this type of template function for
compatibility with a large range of compilers. You you are happy with
the code as is then hey it makes my life easier...
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73, (continued)
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73, David Bateman, 2006/03/14
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73,
David Bateman <=
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73, David Bateman, 2006/03/14
Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/16