[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: moving toward a 3.0 release
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: moving toward a 3.0 release |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:51:19 -0400 |
On 28-Sep-2006, David Grohmann wrote:
| So if your goal is to increase the
| number of users of octave the most efficient way to do that is to simply
| (ok so I know its not simple) work on some kind of byte code or JIT
| backend for octave that speeds up loops.
I'll get right on that. I think I can be done by later today.
Seriously, you must know that this is a large project for which most
of us here have no knowledge of how to proceed. If people expect
something like this, then I think they need to start thinking about
real ways to find funding for such a project, along with finding some
people who are actually capable of doing the work.
jwe
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, (continued)
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Søren Hauberg, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Quentin Spencer, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, David Grohmann, 2006/09/28
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Tom Holroyd (NIH/NIMH) [E], 2006/09/28
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Bill Denney, 2006/09/29
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, David Grohmann, 2006/09/29
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Tom Holroyd (NIH/NIMH) [E], 2006/09/29
- Interpreter performance (was: Re: moving toward a 3.0 release), John W. Eaton, 2006/09/29
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, David Bateman, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, David Bateman, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/27
- Re: moving toward a 3.0 release, Bill Denney, 2006/09/27