[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?) |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:53:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080306) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> I've added spkron.m and issuperuser.m to the SOURCES lists in the
> appropriate Makefile.in files in the default branch, but I don't see
> how that can be the solution if you are building from the hg archive.
> It would prevent the files from being placed in a distribution tar
> file though...
>
As all of the sparse dispatched functions are gone, should we created
deprecated functions from them as well? That is spmax, spmin, splu,
spqr, spchol, etc, etc. There are at least 20 of them..
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), (continued)
- test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/02
- test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
- test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?),
David Bateman <=
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), David Bateman, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03