[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-devel] Seeking advice on Pan license issue with optional TLS co
|
From: |
Dominique Dumont |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-devel] Seeking advice on Pan license issue with optional TLS component |
|
Date: |
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:55:36 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Le mardi 12 février 2013 14:26:18, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
> Since this is the first time I'm dealing with a trciky licensing issue,
> I'd like some folks from debian-legal mailing list to confirm my opinion.
As mentioned here [1], my proposal is a bad idea. GPL license is transitive.
Since any change you might do upstream to fix this situation will be too late
or too intrusive to be accepted for next Debian release (which is currently in
deep freeze), I have no choice but to remove SSL support from Pan in Debian
Wheezy.
I'll put back SSL support for Pan in Debian unstable once the problematic code
is relicensed or re-written.
Dominique
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=22;att=0;bug=699892
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.