[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-devel] Seeking advice on Pan license issue with optional TLS co
|
From: |
Dominique Dumont |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-devel] Seeking advice on Pan license issue with optional TLS component |
|
Date: |
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:30:16 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Hello
Le samedi 16 février 2013 14:52:15, Heinrich Müller a écrit :
> Thanks for the info, i think i'll switch over to using PolarSSL which is
> GPLv2
I got some interesting info from Kalle:
It looks like the license of GNUTLS 3.1.x may eventually be
changed from LGPLv3+ back to LGPLv2.1+. If that succeeds,
I believe it would solve the incompatibility with Pan.
http://lists.gnutls.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2013-February/006086.html
Alternatively, the SSL support could be rewritten to use the NSS
library from Mozilla; that one remains GPLv2-compatible. I don't
know yet how different its API is.
Hope this helps
Dominique
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.