pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan basic behavior, dangerous thing(s) overlooked ?


From: meaty
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan basic behavior, dangerous thing(s) overlooked ?
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:44:02 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225

Duncan wrote:

Charles Kerr posted <address@hidden>,
excerpted below,  on Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:53:24 -0800:

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:41:23PM -0500, meaty wrote:
How dangerous is it to select all subscribed groups, right click and
select Delete Groups accidently instead of Delete Groups Articles and
end up deleting all your subscribed groups without confirmation?  This
is a serious flaw that needs some attention.
File a bugzilla report.

That's a good one that does need a (possibly configurable) confirmation..
yes.  However...

It's probably a good habit to get into of not getting that close to a
dangerous location in the first place..  Thus, rather than use the above
technique, I've taken to using select-all, mark read, or select-all,
delete, from the header pane, b4 I leave a group, rather than doing all
groups together from the group pane.

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that a confirmation should be
there at least if deleting more than a group at once, but it does help
keep me out of danger, and possibly explains why the issue hasn't been
brought up b4 this..

The only reason I do it by group is that filtering groups leaves an unread message count even when all the group's messages are gone in the headers tab. Well I think it is caused by filters anyway. However if you go to the groups tab and select them all, and choose delete groups messages, it zeros the unread message count. Maybe the fact that the unread count doesn't zero after deleting all headers is the real bug that needs fixed ?





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]