[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] adc injected vs regular chanels

From: Gautier Hattenberger
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] adc injected vs regular chanels
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:06:23 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7

Hello Chris,

I'm working on the regular adc implementation for the F4. It is not on github yet, but if you really want to work on it, I can share it. Otherwise, just wait a little bit, it's on the todo list...


Le 01/08/2013 21:36, Chris a écrit :
For anyone that might know:
Is there any particular reason (timing, flexibility, etc) that makes the paparazzi stm32 code to use injected channels (max 4 for each adc converter) for the adc and not the regular adc conversion method (scan etc)?

Paparazzi-devel mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]