[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space()
From: |
Martin Schröder |
Subject: |
Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space() |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:27:32 +0100 |
2008/11/14 Aleksander Morgado <address@hidden>:
> Yes, it's probably better than using directly pdf_i64_t. In OS without
> built-in 64bit support, pdf_off_t will be 32-bits, and 64-bits or longer in
> all the others. Right?
It will be 32 if you compile without LFS. Which current OS doesn't have LFS?
Best
Martin
- [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), Aleksander Morgado, 2008/11/14
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), jemarch, 2008/11/14
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(),
Martin Schröder <=
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), jemarch, 2008/11/14
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), gerel, 2008/11/14
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), Martin Schröder, 2008/11/15
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), gerel, 2008/11/15
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), Martin Schröder, 2008/11/15
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), jemarch, 2008/11/15
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), gerel, 2008/11/15
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), Aleksander Morgado, 2008/11/15
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), jemarch, 2008/11/15
- Re: [pdf-devel] pdf_fsys_disk_get_free_space(), Aleksander Morgado, 2008/11/15