Re: [Protux-devel] [Fwd: compile error]

[Martin Herren]

Remon Sijrier wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm following Protux-development for a while now. And it looks very promising! 
> I looked around on the internet for good audio applications for (home) sound 
> recording on the hard disk, but protux is the only one who fits to my needs 
> it seems (well, after 2.0 is out :) )  So a few weeks ago I tried to compile 
> the stable version and encountered the same problem with the rewind() 
> function.
>
> I changed it to goto_begin() and everything works just fine now. Only thing 
> is, you can't do much at the moment with protux :(
> I also had to remove the std:: before the rewind() call, don't know why, but 
> now it works :)
yeah, when rewind is not declared in the std namespace, you have to 
remove the std:: in front of it, but to do this you have to change the 
name of Audio::rewind like you did.
To do this change in CVS i prefer to wait until Luciano (the main 
develloper) has again an internet connection, because if we change to 
much the code, there will be problems to merge all what he develloped 
offline...

> If there are simpel things (I'm not a c++ programmer at the moment, only read 
> the basics about it, did some stuff with Java) I can help with, let me know, 
> the sooner this programm has a production level, the better it is ;). Because 
> for audio recordings I have to deal with Windows, and I want to switch over 
> to linux completely. This is the last thing I have to do within Windose :(
>
> Oh, and I had a problem with automake, it only works with automake 1.4  It's 
> maybe an idea to add this in the F.A.Q. , until the problem with multiple 
> automake version are gone?
in fact to regenerate new Makefile.in's from the Makefile.am's automake 
1.5 is required... or at least it should be so...

> Hmm, and last but not least: I can't record with protux, after pressing <R> 
> protux respond with: you have first to arm a track, but this is the way to 
> arm a track, isn't it? and after a second <R> the recording starts? But 
> nothing happens cause no track is armed, thats what protux said. Any help is 
> appreciated :)
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Remon
To arm a track it should be <R> (previously it was <RT>), and to record 
it is just <SPACE> like playback, so it is possible to have full duplex 
record/playback (previously it was <R> for recording).
(hope this is correct, don't have Protux at hand right now)

/Martin