[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs su

From: Dor Laor
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs supportive features
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 12:42:28 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4

On 03/02/2011 12:28 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 03/01/11 15:25, Dor Laor wrote:
On 03/01/2011 02:40 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Spice is the logical place to start, no?  It's the largest single
dependency we have and it does some scary things with qemu_mutex.  I
would use spice as a way to prove the concept.

I agree it is desirable to the this for spice but it is allot more
complex than virtagent isolation. Spice is performance sensitive and
contains much more state. It needs to access the guest memory for
reading the surfaces. It can be solved but needs some major changes.
Adding spice-devel to the discussion.

Please don't add broken misconfigured mailing lists, which require
moderator or subscription, to discussions on public lists.

Isn't it simpler to ask the spice list maintainer (Alon Levy, CCed) to do it?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]