[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs su

From: Jes Sorensen
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs supportive features
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:47:53 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7

On 03/02/11 11:42, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 12:28 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 03/01/11 15:25, Dor Laor wrote:
>>> I agree it is desirable to the this for spice but it is allot more
>>> complex than virtagent isolation. Spice is performance sensitive and
>>> contains much more state. It needs to access the guest memory for
>>> reading the surfaces. It can be solved but needs some major changes.
>>> Adding spice-devel to the discussion.
>> Please don't add broken misconfigured mailing lists, which require
>> moderator or subscription, to discussions on public lists.
> Isn't it simpler to ask the spice list maintainer (Alon Levy, CCed) to
> do it?

We cannot have a discussion on a mailing list if we constantly have to
wait for the list maintainer to approve it. There is really zero
justification for closing a development list of an open source project.
Spam is handled in other ways, this doesn't solve it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]