Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs supportive features

[Jes Sorensen]

On 03/02/11 11:42, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 12:28 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 03/01/11 15:25, Dor Laor wrote:
>>> I agree it is desirable to the this for spice but it is allot more
>>> complex than virtagent isolation. Spice is performance sensitive and
>>> contains much more state. It needs to access the guest memory for
>>> reading the surfaces. It can be solved but needs some major changes.
>>> Adding spice-devel to the discussion.
>>
>> Please don't add broken misconfigured mailing lists, which require
>> moderator or subscription, to discussions on public lists.
> 
> Isn't it simpler to ask the spice list maintainer (Alon Levy, CCed) to
> do it?

We cannot have a discussion on a mailing list if we constantly have to
wait for the list maintainer to approve it. There is really zero
justification for closing a development list of an open source project.
Spam is handled in other ways, this doesn't solve it.

Cheers,
Jes