qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any interest in dwc-otg (aka dwc2) device emulation? For Raspi 3 and


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: Any interest in dwc-otg (aka dwc2) device emulation? For Raspi 3 and below.
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:52:40 +0000

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 08:15:33PM -0700, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> Thanks for the tips! I found an issue when testing with the usb-storage
> device, so I will work on fixing that, and then think about how best to
> split up the patches.

Please CC Gerd Hoffmann (QEMU USB maintainer) when sending your patches.
Thanks!

Stefan

> 
> Thanks,
> Paul
> 
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 7:23 PM John Snow <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On 3/6/20 7:34 PM, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > I have been working on an emulation of the dwc-otg USB controller
> > > (host mode only for now), as implemented on the Raspberry Pi 3 and
> > > below, and on numerous other embedded platforms. I have it to a point
> > > where it works pretty well with the dwc2 driver in the mainline Linux
> > > kernel, and with the dwc-otg driver in the Raspbian kernel. Mouse and
> > > keyboard work fine, and I *think* the usb-net device is working too,
> > > although I have been unsuccessful in connecting to the outside world
> > > with it.
> > >
> > > I haven't done anything with gadget-mode yet, but that could certainly
> > > be added in the future.
> > >
> > > Would there be any interest in me submitting this for inclusion in
> > > Qemu? I ask because I see there was a previous effort at this at
> > > github.com/0xabu/qemu/hw/usb/bcm2835_usb.c, but it seems it never went
> > > anywhere.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Paul
> > >
> >
> > At a minimum, I think you should send your patches to the list for
> > posterity even if they don't wind up getting enough review pressure to
> > be merged.
> >
> > If you want advice on how to split up your patches to entice more
> > reviewers, please let us know and any one of us can write a thousand
> > more :words: that might help make a better case.
> >
> > (There's a much-too-long wiki entry on the matter, if you are brave.)
> >
> > The issue, as always, is usually just reviewer time -- and how squeaky
> > the wheel is. Making the patches look pretty and well organized is one
> > way to trick well meaning people into reviewing your patches.
> >
> > --js
> >
> >

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]