qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH 22/25] acpi/cxl: Create the CEDT (9.14.1)


From: Ben Widawsky
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 22/25] acpi/cxl: Create the CEDT (9.14.1)
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 14:05:02 -0800

On 20-11-16 17:15:03, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:47:21 -0800
> Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > The CXL Early Discovery Table is defined in the CXL 2.0 specification as
> > a way for the OS to get CXL specific information from the system
> > firmware.
> > 
> > As of CXL 2.0 spec, only 1 sub structure is defined, the CXL Host Bridge
> > Structure (CHBS) which is primarily useful for telling the OS exactly
> > where the MMIO for the host bridge is.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> Trivial comments inline.
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> > ---
> >  hw/acpi/cxl.c                       | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c                |  6 ++-
> >  hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 21 +--------
> >  include/hw/acpi/cxl.h               |  4 ++
> >  include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h         | 25 ++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/cxl.c b/hw/acpi/cxl.c
> > index 31ceaeecc3..c9631763ad 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/cxl.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/cxl.c
> > @@ -18,14 +18,86 @@
> >   */
> >  
> >  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> > +#include "hw/sysbus.h"
> > +#include "hw/pci/pci_bridge.h"
> > +#include "hw/pci/pci_host.h"
> >  #include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
> > +#include "hw/mem/memory-device.h"
> >  #include "hw/acpi/acpi.h"
> >  #include "hw/acpi/aml-build.h"
> >  #include "hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.h"
> >  #include "hw/acpi/cxl.h"
> > +#include "hw/acpi/cxl.h"
> >  #include "qapi/error.h"
> >  #include "qemu/uuid.h"
> >  
> > +static void cedt_build_chbs(GArray *table_data, PXBDev *cxl)
> > +{
> > +    SysBusDevice *sbd = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(cxl->cxl.cxl_host_bridge);
> > +    struct MemoryRegion *mr = sbd->mmio[0].memory;
> > +
> > +    /* Type */
> > +    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 0, 1);
> > +
> > +    /* Reserved */
> > +    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 0xff, 1);
> 
> Why 0xff rather than 0x00?  ACPI uses default of 0 for reserved bits
> (5.2.1 in ACPI 6.3 spec)
> 
> > +
> > +    /* Record Length */
> > +    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 32, 2);
> > +
> > +    /* UID */
> > +    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, cxl->uid, 4);
> > +
> > +    /* Version */
> > +    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 1, 4);
> > +
> > +    /* Reserved */
> > +    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 0xffffffff, 4);
> > +
> > +    /* Base */
> > +    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, mr->addr, 8);
> > +
> > +    /* Length */
> > +    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, memory_region_size(mr), 4);
> 
> Better to just treat this as a 64 bit field as per the spec, even though
> it can only contain 0x10000?
> 

Ah, I based this on a pre-release version where it was 32-bit. I'll fix it.

> > +
> > +    /* Reserved */
> > +    build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 0xffffffff, 4);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cxl_foreach_pxb_hb(Object *obj, void *opaque)
> > +{
> > +    Aml *cedt = opaque;
> > +
> > +    if (object_dynamic_cast(obj, TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE)) {
> > +        PXBDev *pxb = PXB_CXL_DEV(obj);
> > +
> > +        cedt_build_chbs(cedt->buf, pxb);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void cxl_build_cedt(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data,
> > +                    BIOSLinker *linker)
> > +{
> > +    const int cedt_start = table_data->len;
> > +    Aml *cedt;
> > +
> > +    cedt = init_aml_allocator();
> > +
> > +    /* reserve space for CEDT header */
> > +    acpi_add_table(table_offsets, table_data);
> > +    acpi_data_push(cedt->buf, sizeof(AcpiTableHeader));
> > +
> > +    object_child_foreach_recursive(object_get_root(), cxl_foreach_pxb_hb, 
> > cedt);
> > +
> > +    /* copy AML table into ACPI tables blob and patch header there */
> > +    g_array_append_vals(table_data, cedt->buf->data, cedt->buf->len);
> > +    build_header(linker, table_data, (void *)(table_data->data + 
> > cedt_start),
> > +                 "CEDT", table_data->len - cedt_start, 1, NULL, NULL);
> > +    free_aml_allocator();
> > +}
> > +
> >  static Aml *__build_cxl_osc_method(void)
> >  {
> >      Aml *method, *if_uuid, *else_uuid, *if_arg1_not_1, *if_cxl, 
> > *if_caps_masked;
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > index dd1f8b39d4..eda62dcd6a 100644
> > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@
> >  #include "hw/acpi/ipmi.h"
> >  #include "hw/acpi/hmat.h"
> >  
> > +#include "hw/acpi/cxl.h"
> > +
> >  /* These are used to size the ACPI tables for -M pc-i440fx-1.7 and
> >   * -M pc-i440fx-2.0.  Even if the actual amount of AML generated grows
> >   * a little bit, there should be plenty of free space since the DSDT
> > @@ -1662,7 +1664,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> >  
> >              scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
> >              if (type == CXL) {
> > -                dev = aml_device("CXL%.01X", pci_bus_uid(bus));
> > +                dev = aml_device("CXL%.01X", uid);
> >              } else {
> >                  dev = aml_device("PC%.02X", bus_num);
> >              }
> > @@ -2568,6 +2570,8 @@ void acpi_build(AcpiBuildTables *tables, MachineState 
> > *machine)
> >                            machine->nvdimms_state, machine->ram_slots);
> >      }
> >  
> > +    cxl_build_cedt(table_offsets, tables_blob, tables->linker);
> > +
> >      acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> >      build_waet(tables_blob, tables->linker);
> >  
> > diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c 
> > b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> > index 75910f5870..b2c1d9056a 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> > +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> > @@ -57,26 +57,6 @@ DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_DEV,
> >  DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_PCIE_DEV,
> >                           TYPE_PXB_PCIE_DEVICE)
> >  
> > -#define TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE "pxb-cxl"
> > -DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_CXL_DEV,
> > -                         TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE)
> > -
> > -struct PXBDev {
> > -    /*< private >*/
> > -    PCIDevice parent_obj;
> > -    /*< public >*/
> > -
> > -    uint8_t bus_nr;
> > -    uint16_t numa_node;
> > -    int32_t uid;
> > -    struct cxl_dev {
> > -        HostMemoryBackend *memory_window[CXL_WINDOW_MAX];
> > -
> > -        uint32_t num_windows;
> > -        hwaddr *window_base[CXL_WINDOW_MAX];
> > -    } cxl;
> > -};
> > -
> >  typedef struct CXLHost {
> >      PCIHostState parent_obj;
> >  
> > @@ -351,6 +331,7 @@ static void pxb_dev_realize_common(PCIDevice *dev, enum 
> > BusType type,
> >          bus = pci_root_bus_new(ds, dev_name, NULL, NULL, 0, 
> > TYPE_PXB_CXL_BUS);
> >          bus->flags |= PCI_BUS_CXL;
> >          PXB_CXL_HOST(ds)->dev = PXB_CXL_DEV(dev);
> > +        PXB_CXL_DEV(dev)->cxl.cxl_host_bridge = ds;
> >      } else {
> >          bus = pci_root_bus_new(ds, "pxb-internal", NULL, NULL, 0, 
> > TYPE_PXB_BUS);
> >          bds = qdev_new("pci-bridge");
> > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/cxl.h b/include/hw/acpi/cxl.h
> > index 7b8f3b8a2e..db2063f8c9 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/acpi/cxl.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/cxl.h
> > @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@
> >  #ifndef HW_ACPI_CXL_H
> >  #define HW_ACPI_CXL_H
> >  
> > +#include "hw/acpi/bios-linker-loader.h"
> > +
> > +void cxl_build_cedt(GArray *table_offsets, GArray *table_data,
> > +                    BIOSLinker *linker);
> >  void build_cxl_osc_method(Aml *dev);
> >  
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> > index a94d350034..50dd7fdf33 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_bridge.h
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
> >  #include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
> > +#include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
> >  #include "qom/object.h"
> >  
> >  typedef struct PCIBridgeWindows PCIBridgeWindows;
> > @@ -81,6 +82,30 @@ struct PCIBridge {
> >  #define PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_PROP_MSI        "msi"
> >  #define PCI_BRIDGE_DEV_PROP_SHPC       "shpc"
> >  
> > +struct PXBDev {
> > +    /*< private >*/
> > +    PCIDevice parent_obj;
> > +    /*< public >*/
> > +
> > +    uint8_t bus_nr;
> > +    uint16_t numa_node;
> > +    int32_t uid;
> > +
> > +    struct cxl_dev {
> > +        HostMemoryBackend *memory_window[CXL_WINDOW_MAX];
> > +
> > +        uint32_t num_windows;
> > +        hwaddr *window_base[CXL_WINDOW_MAX];
> > +
> > +        void *cxl_host_bridge; /* Pointer to a CXLHost */
> > +    } cxl;
> > +};
> > +
> > +typedef struct PXBDev PXBDev;
> > +#define TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE "pxb-cxl"
> > +DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER(PXBDev, PXB_CXL_DEV,
> > +                         TYPE_PXB_CXL_DEVICE)
> > +
> 
> Seems like this could sensibly be on one line?
> Could have been in earlier patch as well of course.
> 

Yeah - this seems to be the convention throughout the code. I didn't follow the
reasoning when it was introduced (which was recently).

> >  int pci_bridge_ssvid_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint8_t offset,
> >                            uint16_t svid, uint16_t ssid,
> >                            Error **errp);
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]