[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] monitor/qmp: Stop processing requests when shutdown is r
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] monitor/qmp: Stop processing requests when shutdown is requested |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:58:44 +0100 |
Am 15.02.2021 um 13:42 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Am 15.02.2021 um 13:09 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> >> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > monitor_qmp_dispatcher_co() used to check whether shutdown is requested
> >>
> >> "used to": until when?
> >
> > Until right before this patch. Do you prefer present tense to describe
> > the old state?
>
> I've done it both ways. I think present tense works better for me.
> Case in point: I wasn't confident I read your commit message correctly,
> so I asked.
I guess I can just add "Before this patch, ..." to clarify.
> > Also, does your Tested-by imply that you expect someone else to merge
> > this series? I'm planning to send a pull request today, so if that was
> > your intention, I can include it there.
>
> I didn't mean to imply anything beyond "I ran my reproducer, and your
> patches fix it."
>
> I don't mind you including the fixes in your pull request. I also
> don't mind doing a pull request for your fixes. Up to you!
Ok, if you don't mind either way, I'll just fix up the commit message
and include it.
I just asked because it has happened before that everyone was waiting
for someone else to merge a patch. So I made it a habit to ask when a
maintainer replies with some kind of approval without mentioning that
they queued the patch, because that could be a sign that they expect it
to go through a different tree.
Kevin
Re: [PATCH 0/2] monitor: Shutdown fixes, Markus Armbruster, 2021/02/15
Re: [PATCH 0/2] monitor: Shutdown fixes, Markus Armbruster, 2021/02/15