Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] tests/qtest/fdc-test: Add a regression test for CVE-2021-20196

[Hanna Reitz]

On 24.11.21 17:15, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Without the previous commit, when running 'make check-qtest-i386'
> with QEMU configured with '--enable-sanitizers' we get:
>
>    AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL
>    =================================================================
>    ==287878==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000344
>    ==287878==The signal is caused by a WRITE memory access.
>    ==287878==Hint: address points to the zero page.
>        #0 0x564b2e5bac27 in blk_inc_in_flight block/block-backend.c:1346:5
>        #1 0x564b2e5bb228 in blk_pwritev_part block/block-backend.c:1317:5
>        #2 0x564b2e5bcd57 in blk_pwrite block/block-backend.c:1498:11
>        #3 0x564b2ca1cdd3 in fdctrl_write_data hw/block/fdc.c:2221:17
>        #4 0x564b2ca1b2f7 in fdctrl_write hw/block/fdc.c:829:9
>        #5 0x564b2dc49503 in portio_write softmmu/ioport.c:201:9
>
> Add the reproducer for CVE-2021-20196.
>
> Suggested-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
> Reviewed-by: Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>   tests/qtest/fdc-test.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/fdc-test.c b/tests/qtest/fdc-test.c
> index 26b69f7c5cd..8f6eee84a47 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/fdc-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/fdc-test.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@
>   /* TODO actually test the results and get rid of this */
>   #define qmp_discard_response(...) qobject_unref(qmp(__VA_ARGS__))
>   
> +#define DRIVE_FLOPPY_BLANK \
> +    "-drive 
> if=floppy,file=null-co://,file.read-zeroes=on,format=raw,size=1440k"
> +
>   #define TEST_IMAGE_SIZE 1440 * 1024
>   
>   #define FLOPPY_BASE 0x3f0
> @@ -546,6 +549,40 @@ static void fuzz_registers(void)
>       }
>   }
>   
> +static bool qtest_check_clang_sanitizer(void)
> +{
> +#if defined(__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__) || __has_feature(address_sanitizer)
> +    return true;
> +#else
> +    g_test_skip("QEMU not configured using --enable-sanitizers");
> +    return false;
> +#endif
> +}
> +static void test_cve_2021_20196(void)
> +{
> +    QTestState *s;
> +
> +    if (!qtest_check_clang_sanitizer()) {
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    s = qtest_initf("-nographic -m 32M -nodefaults " DRIVE_FLOPPY_BLANK);
> +
> +    qtest_outw(s, 0x3f4, 0x0500);
> +    qtest_outb(s, 0x3f5, 0x00);
> +    qtest_outb(s, 0x3f5, 0x00);
> +    qtest_outw(s, 0x3f4, 0x0000);
> +    qtest_outb(s, 0x3f5, 0x00);
> +    qtest_outw(s, 0x3f1, 0x0400);
> +    qtest_outw(s, 0x3f4, 0x0000);
> +    qtest_outw(s, 0x3f4, 0x0000);
> +    qtest_outb(s, 0x3f5, 0x00);
> +    qtest_outb(s, 0x3f5, 0x01);
> +    qtest_outw(s, 0x3f1, 0x0500);
> +    qtest_outb(s, 0x3f5, 0x00);
> +    qtest_quit(s);
> +}
> +

Now this works as a reproducer for me, but... this is a completely 
different I/O sequence now, right?

Can’t complain, though, I didn’t understand the previous one, I can’t 
claim I need to understand this one or why they’re different.

All the rest looks good to me, so all in all:

Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>