Re: no more pullreq processing til February

[Daniel P . Berrangé]

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 01:39:08PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 26.01.2023 um 15:28 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben:
> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 14:25, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Are you batching pull requests? I used that approach last release
> > > cycle. CI takes so long to run that I didn't want to run it for every
> > > pull request. Batching worked well overall.
> > 
> > No, I just do one test per pullreq. IME the CI is flaky
> > enough that I don't really want to batch it up, and it
> > isn't so slow that I build up a backlog of unprocessed
> > requests.
> 
> But obviously so slow that we've run out of minutes. It would be good if
> this didn't happen every month in the future.

Note that January has been an outlier because there was no pullreq
processing for 2 weeks due to holidays, so we were merging at a
somewhat higher rate than in previous months.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|