[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Pegasos2 emulation

From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Pegasos2 emulation
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 12:49:47 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0

On 3/16/21 10:01 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 15/03/2021 à 13:33, BALATON Zoltan a écrit :
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>> I've started posting this series well in advance to get it into 6.0 and yet 
>>> it seems like it may
>>> be missing it due to organisational issues (no real complaints were found 
>>> with patches but
>>> Philippe seems to like more review that does not seem to happen as nobody 
>>> is interested). Looks
>>> like David is waiting for an ack from Philippe but will be away next week 
>>> so if this is not
>>> resolved now it may be too late on Monday. To avoid that:
>>> David, could you please send an ack before you leave for the last two 
>>> patches so it could get
>>> committed via some other tree while you're away?
>>> Philippe, if you can't ack the vt82c686 patches now are you OK with taking 
>>> the whole series via
>>> your tree before the freeze? That would give you some more days to review 
>>> and it could always be
>>> reverted during the freeze but if it's not merged now I'll have to wait 
>>> until the summer to get it
>>> in again which would be another long delay. I don't think this will get 
>>> more reviews unless it's
>>> in master and people can start using and testing it better.
>> Hello,
>> Since David seems to be away for this week before seeing my mail asking for 
>> an ack from him, now
>> this can only get in by Philippe or Peter. (David said before he'd be OK 
>> with the series if Philippe
>> acked it so I think that can count as an implicit ack and it could always be 
>> reverted before the
>> releease.)
>> Philippe, do you have anything against this to get merged now? If not please 
>> send a pull or ack it
>> so it has a chance to be in 6.0 or tell if you still intend to do anything 
>> about it before the
>> freeze. This series was on the list since January and the remaining parts 
>> you did not take are here
>> since February 22nd and the version after your first review since two weeks 
>> so it would be nice to
>> sort this out and not block it any further without a good reason.
> Pegasos looks like a New World PowerMac, so perhaps Mark can help?

The PPC part is mostly reviewed. The problem is the first patch:
"vt82c686: Implement control of serial port io ranges via config regs".

I don't understand it. Zoltan said Paolo isn't acking it because
he doesn't mind. I prefer to be cautious and think than Paolo is
rather too busy.

Laurent, Peter, can you have a look at it?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]