Re: Rewriting header incorrectly?

[Don Armstrong]

On Wed, 02 Dec 2009, Daniel Norton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Don Armstrong <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Regardless, patch it if you want; it's pretty trivial. [You just have
> > to be aware that the resulting Received header may not match at all
> > the correct Received header which would have been present if the mail
> > wasn't rewritten.]
> 
> That's okay. The purpose is to create an RFC2821-compliant message
> with the trace information that's required for spam reporting.

You don't need to do this to report spam; just don't rewrite the body,
and send the message on as is. [I would think that spamcop et al.
would want the actual message, not the "sanitized" version that
spamassassin attaches.]


Don Armstrong

-- 
"Because," Fee-5 explained patiently, "I was born in the fifth row.
Any fool would understand that, but against stupidity the very Gods
themselves contend in vain."
 -- Alfred Bester _The Computer Connection_ p19

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu