Re: Rewriting header incorrectly?

[Don Armstrong]

On Tue, 01 Dec 2009, Daniel Norton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Don Armstrong <address@hidden> wrote:
> > It shouldn't matter; that mail should never be resent on by anything.
> 
> Except to spamcop, which rejects it for this reason. Or anything
> else that processes and analyzes spam.

That's because you're having SA rewrite the entire message. If you
don't do that, you won't see this header at all. [If you just have the
X-Spam* headers inserted, the Received: header that spamass-milter
generates doesn't get propogated anywhere.]

Regardless, patch it if you want; it's pretty trivial. [You just have
to be aware that the resulting Received header may not match at all
the correct Received header which would have been present if the mail
wasn't rewritten.]


Don Armstrong

-- 
A people living under the perpetual menace of war and invasion is very
easy to govern. It demands no social reforms. It does not haggle over
expenditures on armaments and military equipment. It pays without
discussion, it ruins itself, and that is an excellent thing for the
syndicates of financiers and manufacturers for whom patriotic terrors
are an abundant source of gain.
 -- Anatole France

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu