[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Language selection in speechd-el
From: |
Pierre Lorenzon |
Subject: |
Language selection in speechd-el |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:19:03 +0100 (CET) |
Sorry Milan,
I understood my stupid mistake : defining a voice without
language property is not obtained by setting the string field
to blank which means that the parameter is set to the empty
string corresponding to nothing, but by disabling the check box
infront of the language parameter : then it works as expected
or at least as I expect !
Regards
Pierre
From: Milan Zamazal <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Language selection in speechd-el
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:02:18 +0100
> >>>>> "PL" == Pierre Lorenzon <devel at pollock-nageoire.net> writes:
>
> PL> But anyway, there are also cases where the buffer is monolingual
> PL> and where there are several pieces with different status and it
> PL> will be very good to have an idea of these various status
> PL> through a speech difference. The situation can be language
> PL> independant. For instance in a w3m.el buffer somme pieces are
> PL> url, clickable buttons and so on.
>
> Well, I'm not sure I've understood you correctly. Do you mean the input
> method language is not respected when *any* voice is assigned to the
> given face or only when a voice with language property set is assigned
> to the face? In the first case it would be a bug (I tried it and it
> works correctly for me, i.e. face without language property set doesn't
> override input method language). In the latter case, do you really want
> to set a language explicitly for a particular voice and then to override
> it with input method language selection (it looks a bit odd, any example
> of real use)?
>
> PL> So to sum up I would greatly appreciate that the user have
> PL> more control on the priority schedule : allowing face to control
> PL> the language when necessary but let the connection control it
> PL> for instance when desired.
>
> Yes, if I understand your motivation behind the requirement correctly, I
> can add it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Milan Zamazal
>