Patch (rather for discussion): sonic and samplerate implementation

[William Hubbs]

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:33:14PM +0100, Andrei Kholodnyi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bohdan R. Rau <ethanak at polip.com> wrote:
> >> Since Bill has proposed to integrate libsonic,
> >> I'd say the first step would be to grab sonic src and put it under
> >> e.g. src/libs/sonic
> >
> > I don't think it's good idea.
> > For me: libraries which may be used out of speech-dispatcher should be
> > shipped separately. But of course it should be possible to build these
> > libraries together with speech dispatcher, or must be accessible from
> > speech-dispatcher site.
> > There shoud be dotconf, sonic and dumbtts (I think).
> 
> Very good idea. However I'm neither Bill, nor William :D

I'm not opposed to sd using sonic, but I am opposed to integrating it
into the source tree.  The same goes for dotconf.  These are general
purpose libraries, and definitely do not belong in the sd source tree.

William

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.freebsoft.org/pipermail/speechd/attachments/20101206/46329693/attachment.pgp>