Patch (rather for discussion): sonic and samplerate implementation

[Andrei Kholodnyi]

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:42 PM, William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:33:14PM +0100, Andrei Kholodnyi wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bohdan R. Rau <ethanak at polip.com> wrote:
>> >> Since Bill has proposed to integrate libsonic,
>> >> I'd say the first step would be to grab sonic src and put it under
>> >> e.g. src/libs/sonic
>> >
>> > I don't think it's good idea.
>> > For me: libraries which may be used out of speech-dispatcher should be
>> > shipped separately. But of course it should be possible to build these
>> > libraries together with speech dispatcher, or must be accessible from
>> > speech-dispatcher site.
>> > There shoud be dotconf, sonic and dumbtts (I think).
>>
>> Very good idea. However I'm neither Bill, nor William :D
>
> I'm not opposed to sd using sonic, but I am opposed to integrating it
> into the source tree. ?The same goes for dotconf. ?These are general
> purpose libraries, and definitely do not belong in the sd source tree.

my reply was not clear, sorry for that
I was talking about the possibility to host libs on freebsoft site as
Bohdan has suggested.
I agree it is better to keep them separately from SD.
My only concern was it is difficult to find them if someone wants to
use them together with SD.