[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] Re: Weird behavior with XRandR and two screens
From: |
Joeli Hokkanen |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] Re: Weird behavior with XRandR and two screens |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:57:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On 07:48 Tue 10 Mar , Michael Raskin wrote:
> Joeli Hokkanen wrote:
> > I uncommented the virtual line after that and set up .xsession with my
> > intended setup, but it didn't work either. About half of the time I was
> > at the ``normal'' environment where everything was still just one big
> > screen, and at other times only the VGA monitor worked while the DVI
> > monitor went nuts at every trace of movement.
> >
> > I'm out of ideas on what could be wrong. Any help would be greatly
> > appreciated.
>
> What does "xrandr -q" say when you enable "Virtual" line?
I got this message to my personal mailbox instead through the mailing
list, but I'll reply to the mailing list as it obviously is relevant to
my problem.
~ % xrandr -q
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2720 x 1024, maximum 2720 x 1024
VGA connected 1280x1024+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
338mm x 270mm
1280x1024 60.0*+ 75.0 60.0 60.0*
1280x960 60.0
1152x864 75.0 75.0
1024x768 75.1 75.0 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 75.0 72.8 75.0 60.0 59.9
720x400 70.1
TMDS-1 connected 1440x900+1280+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y
axis) 408mm x 255mm
1440x900 59.9*+ 60.0
1280x1024 75.0 60.0 60.0
1280x960 60.0 60.0
1152x864 75.0 75.0
1024x768 75.1 75.0 70.1 60.0
832x624 74.6
800x600 72.2 75.0 60.3 56.2
640x480 75.0 72.8 75.0 60.0 59.9
720x400 70.1
Regards,
Joeli