swarm-support
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

3rd Problem Installing Swarm2.0 in LinuxPPC R5


From: Darren Schreiber
Subject: 3rd Problem Installing Swarm2.0 in LinuxPPC R5
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 10:23:38 -0700

>DS> `/home/darren/swarm-2.0/libobjc/config/powerpc/compiler-info-generic.h',
>
>In /home/darren/swarm-2.0/libobjc/config/powerpc, try copying
>../i386/compiler-info-linux-gnu.h to compiler-info-generic.h.
>
>You're the first person to attempt to use Swarm 2.0 on a Power PC.
>The Objective C / Java link requires machine-dependent macros and
>compiler information in order to do its thing, and these features have
>not yet been tested on PPC. At worst you should be able to
>comment out mframe.m from MSRC in the libobjc Makefile and build without
>the feature that is (only) used by the Java layer.

I copied the /i386/compiler-info-linux-gnu.h file and saved it as /home/darren/swarm-2.0/libobjc/config/powerpc/compiler-info-generic.h


Then, I went to the Makefile in libobjc, searched for the mframe.m in MSRC and commented it out.

I configured, and typed make. It ran for a while and I got the following:

gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/darren/swarm-2.0/libobjc -I. -I./objc -I/home/darren/swarm-2.0/libobjc/objc -I/home/darren/swarm-2.0/libobjc -DBUILDING_LIBOBJC -g -O2 -c -fPIC -DPIC sendmsg.c -o .libs/sendmsg.lo
sendmsg.c:34: #error cc1obj -print-runtime-info must report MFRAME_STACK_STRUCT
make[4]: *** [sendmsg.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/darren/swarm-2.0/libobjc'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/darren/swarm-2.0/libobjc'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/darren/swarm-2.0/libobjc'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/darren/swarm-2.0'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
[darren@(none) swarm-2.0]$


I went back and commented out all of the mentions of mframe, but this didn't change anything.

Since I am not planning on using Java, I am not concerned about removing this capability. But, where do I go now?


_____________________________________________

Darren Schreiber
Attorney at Law
Graduate Student
Political Science, UCLA
address@hidden
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]