Re: [Tiger-devel] [RFC] Diferences between 'empty and set' and 'unset' variables

[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]

On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:53:50PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña 
> wrote:
> > However, this does not work for me, scripts executing haveallvars do not
> > run because of these changes. I have changed the code (and readded the val
> > statement). Changes are in CVS, please take a look at them.
> 
> Thank you for all the time you passed on this. But if you think it's a
> non issue (which is probably the case), don't loose your time on this.
> 

Well, I do believe it's an issue, I haven't thought of it, but it makes the 
haveallvars implementation better after all.

> I've tested the last CVS revision, but it did not worked as I expected:
(...)

It turns out that I tested this in bash but did not test the script itself 
after commiting the change.

> Using eval solved it:
(...)
> Here are the results of this version (a patch is attached):

I've applied the patch, thank you very much.

Javi

pgp2m8UrZU3aj.pgp
Description: PGP signature