Re: www.gnu.org guidelines and the plan for hurd.gnu.org

[Ognyan Kulev]

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:26:05AM -0700, Jim Franklin wrote:
> Hi,
>  Thanks for the link. I reckon the chances are better for the folks who
> follow the guidelines on getting their work past the gnu webmasters. Myself,
> I have a hankering to try my hand at writing some XML although most of my
> work will be HTML 4 comliant with use of CSS. My opinion is everyone should
> go with what they want to try and what the gnu webmasters don't like, I'm
> sure they'll let us know when we ask them for a final review of our work. It
> will be the gnu webmasters who have the final say on the work.
> 
> Jim

So, is this the situation?

1. We build a web-site.  The parts of the site are send to web-hurd for
   approval among ourselfs. 
2. Ask gnu.org webmasters if it is ok
3. If not, change it and go to 2
4. Upload the new site till 31 May


And something important.  I'm exploring GNUMach now and the documents Mach 3
Kernel Principles and Mach 3 Server Writer are *very* good.  But I don't
know what their license is.  They can be found in
ftp://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/mach/cmu/doc/osf/

Regards
-- 
Ognyan Kulev <address@hidden>, "\"Programmer\""