[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modific
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Dec 2022 10:19:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On December 5, 2022 5:49:14 AM GMT+02:00, Stefan Monnier
<monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> Don't bother, please.
> Instead, I recommend you disallow the use of tree sitter in indirect
> buffers. And we should probably try and change `insdel.c` so it always
> runs the `after/before-change-functions` in the base buffer (this should
> fix the worst part of the problems).
Will this "hold water" vis-a-vis the expectations of various features that
would like to use tree sitter related capabilities? Regardless of your opinion
on indirect buffers, many 3rd party packages and features use indirect buffers
as the backbone of their implementation. We don't currently have any
alternatives to that, AFAIK. So I'd expect a lot of disappointment if we
declare that indirect buffers will not be supported by tree sitter as a matter
of design decision.
Changing insdel.c to run stuff in base buffer could be a solution, but I don't
feel we can make such changes on the release branch. But maybe we can do that
now only for treesit.c functions. Yuan, would tgat solve this particular
problem?
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/04
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/06
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/07
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/08