[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modific
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Dec 2022 17:44:49 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>, 59693@debbugs.gnu.org, miha@kamnitnik.top
> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 10:29:06 -0500
>
> > Will this "hold water" vis-a-vis the expectations of various features that
> > would like to use tree sitter related capabilities? Regardless of your
> > opinion on indirect buffers, many 3rd party packages and features use
> > indirect buffers as the backbone of their implementation. We don't
> > currently have any alternatives to that, AFAIK. So I'd expect a lot of
> > disappointment if we declare that indirect buffers will not be supported by
> > tree sitter as a matter of design decision.
>
> I can't see why: a package that uses indirect buffers can just as well
> run its tree-sitter parsers in the base buffer.
I thought about those multi-mode modes, or features that show the same
buffer more than once with different modes.
> > Changing insdel.c to run stuff in base buffer could be a solution, but
> > I don't feel we can make such changes on the release branch.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > But maybe we can do that now only for treesit.c functions.
>
> Sounds OK to me, yes.
OK, thanks. Yuan, will this work for you? can you show a patch along these
lines?
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/04
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/06
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/07
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/08