[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modific
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Dec 2022 14:17:44 +0200 |
> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 18:15:07 -0800
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
> 59693@debbugs.gnu.org,
> miha@kamnitnik.top
>
> 1. Only allow base buffer to have parsers, no change is needed for insdel.c,
> treesit_record_change can find the base buffer and update its parsers. We can
> ask indirect buffers to use their base buffer’s parser. Unless the base
> buffer is narrowed, I think it will work fine.
I think this is fine, but we need to document it.
> I remember that there were a discussion along the lines of user-narrow vs
> low-level narrow, what was the outcome of that discussion?
Nothing in particular, and I don't think it's relevant. If some mode needs
to widen, it can.
Thanks.
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, (continued)
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/04
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Stefan Monnier, 2022/12/05
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/07
- bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/12/08
bug#59693: 29.0.50; treesitter in base buffer doesn't respond to modifications in indirect buffer correctly, Yuan Fu, 2022/12/09