[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:22:30 -0400 |
Goto node "(eintr) Buffer Names", and look at the paragraphs that start at
lines 37 and 49. Both are saying basically the same. Aren't they redundant?
Please tell me the words of the lines you mean; I tried using `M-g
M-g' (`goto-line') and the command went to the beginning of the node;
probably it counted from the beginning of whole buffer as the
documentation says. In any case, I wrote in "(eintr) Who You Are":
Firstly, I try to say everything at least three times: first, to
introduce it; second, to show it in context; and third, to show it in a
different context, or to review it.
and I am pretty sure I covered most things at least twice. You may be a
programmer for whom the book is *not* written.
PS: I don't know if this is the suitable channel for comments/suggestions.
If it isn't, please let me know.
I don't know. Others can comment.
--
Robert J. Chassell
address@hidden address@hidden
http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc
- Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction,
Robert J. Chassell <=
- Message not available
- Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/07/30
- Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction, Fren Zeee, 2010/07/31
- Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction, David Kastrup, 2010/07/31
- Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction, Fren Zeee, 2010/07/31
- Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction, Fren Zeee, 2010/07/31
- RE: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction, Drew Adams, 2010/07/31
- Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/07/31