[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 2020 08:52:52 -0800 (PST) |
> > signal an error for patterns like [:alnum:].
>
> AFAIU, Richard suggested to emit a warning from the byte compiler.
> That might be a good-enough solution, better than signaling an error
> at run time, IMO.
+1. Not only better, but appropriate.
It should be a warning, because it is not an
invalid regexp.
It might generally be a useless regexp, and
it's most likely not what the user intended,
but it's not invalid.
Raising an error would, well, be an error, IMHO.
Displaying a warning during byte-compilation
would be very helpful.
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/22
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Richard Stallman, 2020/02/22
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/23
- RE: :alnum: broken?,
Drew Adams <=
Re: :alnum: broken?, Noam Postavsky, 2020/02/21
Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/21