[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:05:00 +0100 |
27 feb. 2020 kl. 09.43 skrev Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>:
> Right, I missed the break. But I think this is too strict, it should
> not reject "[:a-z$%&/()=:]'
Thank you, and with the later committed addendum that example is accepted as
well. The code still rejects "[:az$%&/()=:]" (no hyphen) but so does GNU grep.
Perhaps we could restrict the filter to letters between the colons; I'm open
for suggestions.
The point is moot now, of course, as the changes have been reverted altogether.
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/22
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Richard Stallman, 2020/02/22
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/23
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/23
Re: :alnum: broken?, Noam Postavsky, 2020/02/21
Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/21