[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:43:15 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
On Feb 26 2020, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> 26 feb. 2020 kl. 17.01 skrev Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>:
>
>> That would break "[:[:alpha:]]".
>
> No, it seems all right.
Right, I missed the break. But I think this is too strict, it should
not reject "[:a-z$%&/()=:]'
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/22
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Richard Stallman, 2020/02/22
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/23
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/23
Re: :alnum: broken?, Noam Postavsky, 2020/02/21
Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/21