[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Mar 2020 00:28:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> Ignore files which are likely authored by package writers (a good hint
>> consists on containing a `provide' or living on certain
>> directories).
>
> On the contrary, these are the people I mostly care to reach.
Well, for me users is a vastly larger and heterogeneous group than
package writers. IMHO those who author and distribute code should look
at compiler warnings, so what I wrote previously was the result of
misunderstanding your "communicating with our users."
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/27
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/22
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Richard Stallman, 2020/02/22
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/23
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/23
- RE: :alnum: broken?, Drew Adams, 2020/02/23