Valentin, you sneaky bastard! Tried to deceive us, huh? But i see the new LilyPond Report announced on Lily website, mwahahahaha! http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-25&lang=en Janek ;-)
1) wait for GLISS. 2) write/edit a scheme or python program to do this. 3) can we get bloody 2.14 out the bloody door before starting yet another bloody round of bloody bike-shedding? I started looki
Hmm. I think the problem might have been solved after Werner installed librsvg and recompiled imagemagick. imagemagick will use this library for the SVG output if found at compile time. Now that I fo
Screw it. I've deleted that file. Patrick: please change the other svg files to not use text. Since this is happening on your local system, feel free to use whatever font(s) you want. The bloody tran
It's been my experience that patching a problem close to its source tends to be most effective. I am working on an Email signature that might be helping to convey the message. Appended manually here:
Yes. Programmers gives things fixed_* tags. Bug squad tests those fixes, or asks for help if necessary, then changes the status of those fixed items to Verified. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug
Well, that was kinda my point :-D Nah, just kidding. Pure Data looks simply gorgeous. For a Plan-9 application. It's interesting that you mention that (since I was the one who first tried to rethink
oh, FFS...! Look, our development environment sucks. Get over it. Kieren has tried, twice, to get it working. He's intelligent, motivated, and spent a lot of time on it. Despite many emails from peop
It should be in good shape. I backported the latest build fixes (autoconf compat, and better font detection), and everything builds fine on my machine. Looking forward to it. :-) Thanks, Patrick
2.13.5 is out, but I don't have the web branch checkout out, and it's 8pm and I'm behind on emails+blog posts+photos to/for my parents, so I'm buggered if I'm going to screw around with updating the
Hi, I was no fan of this addition. But others argued that "git push origin HEAD" would be a better default, so there will not be any default (except when setting push.default). Yes, that is what I re
... And this assumes that you are pushing to the "master" branch. When I push to "web-gop", I use this: git push origin web-gop In the CG, should we say @example git push origin @var{branch} @end exa
The extra setup can be avoided by using git push origin master as the default incantation instead. This works for all git versions. I wasn't sure if we wanted to document the shortened versions or no
Thanks for adding the info about .git/config [push] default = matching to the CG, Patrick! Bloody git developers and their bloody inconsistent commands / setup requirements... Git gurus: could this c
Because if anybody complains, it's kind-of hard to pretend it was an innocent mistake after this archived, public discussion. I guess we can dump legalese at the bottom of the Download page, but it's
Hi James (et al.), No. Please explain. I recently accompanied a few days of auditions for a new musical. The creators and entire artistic panel were from Newfoundland, Canada. One actor came in and,
I'd like to recommend that everyone argues with him [David K.], if you think he is wrong. Otherwise take his posts literal and _not_ offending. That's it. But new contributors cannot be expected to