[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More on CVS layout
From: |
Peter Simons |
Subject: |
Re: More on CVS layout |
Date: |
25 Jan 2005 07:05:32 +0100 |
Tom Howard writes:
> If you had simply told me you were going to do this, I
> could have at least have said "please wait a until I
> commit my licence changes", which would have saved me
> heaps of work, I could have also warned you about the
> affects of such a move and suggested an alternative.
If you hadn't added lots of verbatim text into files but had
just called
for n in "foo.m4 ..."; do
sed <$n >$n.new -e '/@license .*/@license AllPermissive/'
mv $n.new $n
done
with the appropriate list of files, like I _explained_ you
should do right after you volunteered, then the file
movement wouldn't have affected you at all.
Perplexing, isn't it?
I am sorry for your wasted efforts. I really am.
Nonetheless: when I agree with someone to do one thing, but
he goes ahead and does something completely different, then
I don't see how I would be responsible when things go wrong.
So please don't blame me.
Peter
- Having the same contents on gnu.org and sf.net (was: File names), (continued)
- Having the same contents on gnu.org and sf.net (was: File names), Peter Simons, 2005/01/19
- Re: Having the same contents on gnu.org and sf.net, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/19
- Re: Having the same contents on gnu.org and sf.net, Peter Simons, 2005/01/19
- Re: Having the same contents on gnu.org and sf.net, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/19
- Re: Having the same contents on gnu.org and sf.net, Peter Simons, 2005/01/19
- Re: Having the same contents on gnu.org and sf.net, Peter Simons, 2005/01/19
Re: More on CVS layout, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/19
Re: More on CVS layout, Tom Howard, 2005/01/19
Re: More on CVS layout, Tom Howard, 2005/01/25