Re: [avr-gcc-list] [VOTE] objdump patch

[E. Weddington]

Svein E. Seldal wrote:

> Hi
>
> It seems like there are several preferences on how the new objdump 
> with symbols output should look like.
>
> To make a decision more fair (and to do a little experiment), I will 
> now arrange a vote on the syntax of the objdump patch. Here are the 
> choices:
>
>
> A) The old format (as it is today):
>
> 20c:       02 c0           rjmp    .+4         ; 0x212
>
>
> B) New syntax which is easier and faster to read
>
> 20c:       02 c0           rjmp    0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>     ; .+4
>
>
> C) Similar to B) only without excessive comment. My vote.
>
> 20c:       02 c0           rjmp    0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>
>
>
> D) Similar to the old format. The symbol is located in the comment
>
> 20c:       02 c0           rjmp    .+4    ; 0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>
I vote for either B or C. Personally I don't care whether there is an 
excessive comment or not.

Eric