Re: [avrdude-dev] Programmer speed

[idefixx]

On Thursday 09 October 2003 02:38, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert wrote:
> 2) Communication
> b) However, it is difficult to generate accurate (and fast) timings 
> with a PC parallel port. So, a zero parts programmer will probably be 
> much slower.

I believe that a PC parallel port programmer is slower than serial programmers. 
But (as already metioned in thread [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on 
AT90S8535 using AVRdude) I have got the problem if I use the simple Pony Prog 
dongle programming speed for an AT90S8535 is very different by either using 
Pony Prog 2000 ( 30 seconds ) or AVRdude 4.1.0 ( 135 seconds! ). Thus, it must 
be possible to increase the programming speed for AT90S devices as far as Pony 
Prog is able to manage much faster programming times.


Regards.
/idefixx