[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Query on stacktrace management logic
From: |
David Holmes |
Subject: |
RE: Query on stacktrace management logic |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2004 10:25:52 +1000 |
> Since I seem to be the only one that actually wants a VMClass
> instance, maybe we can agree on a slightly different interface.
> How about keep a reference to a VMClass instance in Class, but
> not calling any instance methods on VMClass, but using static
> methods instead (always passing the Class reference along).
I don't understand the purpose of holding a reference to an instance of a
class that only has static methods invoked on it.
What I don't want is to have a different VMClass instance per Class object.
Cheers,
David Holmes
- Re: Query on stacktrace management logic, (continued)
RE: Query on stacktrace management logic, Robert Lougher, 2004/03/07
RE: Query on stacktrace management logic, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/03/10
RE: Query on stacktrace management logic, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/03/12
- RE: Query on stacktrace management logic,
David Holmes <=
RE: Query on stacktrace management logic, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/03/12