[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FW: Flattened GNUstep structure?
From: |
Yann Le Guen |
Subject: |
FW: Flattened GNUstep structure? |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jan 2001 23:35:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2106 |
----------
> De : Yann Le Guen <yann.le-guen@wanadoo.fr>
> Date : Tue, 09 Jan 2001 23:17:58 +0100
> À : Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com>
> Objet : Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm still using deep directory structure since I've one gstep runing on intel
> and another on ppc and feel happy only if my programs run on both
> hardware same way.
>
>> Whatever we/I decide will become the default for all GNUstep packages
>> (although anyone would be free to change it for themselves).
>
> Great, but if I choose *deep-dirs-truct* for cross-platform dev, I'm afraid Im
> going to have some more work for packaging programs if *flattened* becomes the
> default ;-(
> Maybe I'm wrong but these differents directory structures seems to me more
> important for developers than for future users of our "killing applications"
> that they (users) probably will prefer to get as binaries. If I'm not that
> wrong an installation tool/script for such binaries would hide how deep is the
> gstep directory tree.
>
> Later, Yann
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> Yann Le Guen <yann.le-guen@wanadoo.fr>
> gsm: 06 86 67 86 86
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Frederic, 2001/01/09
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Dennis Leeuw, 2001/01/10
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Nicola Pero, 2001/01/10
FW: Flattened GNUstep structure?,
Yann Le Guen <=
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Jason H Clouse, 2001/01/10
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Gregory Casamento, 2001/01/10
Re: Flattened GNUstep structure?, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2001/01/11